![]() |
| The Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons in The Hague works to eliminate the world's toxic arms stockpiles (AFP Photo/JOHN THYS) |
Rijswijk
(Netherlands) (AFP) - Michael Barrett has an old-fashioned flip phone. But when
his hotline rings, he has three hours to ready equipment for experts on a
dangerous mission to probe if toxic weapons have been unleashed -- again.
As
appalling images of panicked children and adults apparently victims of poison
gas or cruel nerve agents go viral, the labs and the equipment store of the
world's global chemical arms watchdog hum with activity.
Tucked away
in a small industrial zone in the Dutch suburb of Rijswijk, the two-storey
building, with about 20 staff, has been key to the two decades of painstaking
work by the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) to
eliminate the world's toxic arms stockpiles.
It was here
that the team, now in Syria waiting for access to Douma where either chlorine
or sarin gas were allegedly used on civilians on April 7, began their mission.
As the
clamour grows for answers, any samples they collect will be sealed and brought
back here, under a strictly monitored chain of custody, for further analysis
and verification.
A former
soldier, Barrett has spent 21 years at the OPCW since its first beginnings,
training and equipping those who volunteer to travel to the world's most toxic
hotspots. He's even deployed himself.
"Of
course you get nervous, if you don't there's something wrong," said the
now 61-year-old, who in recent years has seen the timeline for preparing for
missions getting "shorter and shorter."
From
carbon-impregnated protection suits to elephant-sized rubber boots to cover
shoes, sophisticated detectors, satellite phones and medical kits bristling
with vials of antidotes to the world's deadliest nerve agents, all the
equipment has to be checked and double-checked.
"Can
you imagine if you had a respirator, a gas mask, and the valve was in the wrong
way?" said Barrett wryly, principal logistics technician and team leader
for the equipment store, as he gave AFP an exclusive tour.
'Onerous,
noble task'
Amid
political claim and counter-claim about chemical weapons use in Syria, where
chlorine gas and mustard gas have both been proven to have been used, as well
as the unleashing of a rare nerve agent last month in the sleepy British town
of Salisbury, the focus here remains on protecting the team and preserving the
integrity of science.
No detail
can be overlooked. Even a pinprick hole in a glove could prove fatal if a
deadly nerve agent seeped through the skin to attack a person's nervous system.
VX, the deadliest nerve agent ever invented, can kill within 20 minutes.
Despite
some 7,000 official missions -- 10,000 if you count training missions -- in 21
years, it is a source of pride that no team member has ever been affected by a
chemical weapon.
This
dangerous and methodical work by the OPCW, which has around 400 staff, has
succeeded in eliminating some 96 percent of the world's toxic arms stockpiles.
A feat which won it the Nobel Peace Prize in 2013.
OPCW
director general Ahmet Uzumcu praised his staff then, saying they had
"shouldered an onerous but noble task" working with "quiet
determination to rid the world of these heinous weapons."
"One
of the most dangerous jobs in the OPCW is an analytical chemist, because
they've got to take the sample," said Barrett. Many are scientists who
before joining the OPCW may never even have used a gas mask. Now they can be
working in war zones.
And in 2012,
a new piece of equipment was added to already heavy bags -- body armour made of
kevlar in case they come under fire.
Clues in
plants, soil, blood
Once on
site, a team of experts which can vary between two to 25 members, scans the
area with flame photometric detectors or ion mobility spectrometers to detect
any toxic agents. Paper tests, like litmus tests, can also warn of the presence
of nerve or blister agents.
Working
under tight time constraints, sometimes with less than 20 minutes, they gather
environmental samples, such as plants or soil, or even rubber window seals
which can hold evidence of any contamination for weeks.
Biomedical
samples like blood and urine from alleged victims are also key, and in some
cases tissue from the dead will also be taken.
"We
prefer to take samples from survivors, because those can be interviewed, they
can tell their story, which can be fact-checked from others," said
Marc-Michael Blum, the head of the OPCW laboratory.
Blood
samples are best, Blum says, revealing some nerve agents or blister agents like
mustard leave little traces for weeks, even up to three months, hiding in
people's bodies.
"We
are looking for specific biomarkers in blood. You don’t normally find an intact
agent, but rather it has metabolised," he explained. "Even weeks
after exposure these markers are still there and you can find them."
Once the
samples are brought back to Rijswijk, they are then split and sent to a couple
of the 20 or so independent labs certified by the OPCW around the world.
Amid strict
confidentiality, the labs prepare independent reports, which are then collated
by the OPCW. The aim is to ensure that no question marks are raised over the
integrity of the evidence or the results.
EXCLUSIVE: Inside the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) and their work to rid the world of chemical armshttps://t.co/05k0Nu70qy pic.twitter.com/bmahtbuS23— AFP news agency (@AFP) April 21, 2018
Related Article:


No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.